RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00797
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. Her Retention/Retirement (R/R) Anniversary Date be changed
from 29 October 1979 to 21 September 1979 to allow two Inactive
Duty Training (IDT) participation points to be moved from her
anniversary year ending (AYE) 29 October 1979 to her AYE
29 October 1980.
2. She be credited with her Navy Reserve participation points
accrued in AYE 28 October 1981.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
This transfer of points will allow her a total of 50 points for
AYE 29 October 1980 and a satisfactory year of service towards
retirement. Her anniversary date should coincide with her
reenlistment date.
In support of her appeal, the applicant provides copies of her
Air National Guard/United States Air Force Reserve (ANG/USAFR)
Point Credit Summary, Report on Individual Personnel, and
Statement of Service for Naval Reserve Retirement.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
ARPC/DPTS recommends denial. DPTS states the requested remedy
is contrary to Title 10, United States Code (USC), Section
12732. The applicant served continuously from the time she
entered active status after a civilian break-in-service on
29 October 1975 through her 20 September 1981 discharge. The
first day in active status set the applicants 29 October
anniversary date. Moreover, her 21 September 1979 reenlistment
did not lead to or stem from a break-in-service, and
consequently did not affect her anniversary date. Once set, the
anniversary date would not change unless the Reserve member
changed components, transitioned from inactive to active status
or returned to active status from a civilian break-in-service.
The applicants points and years of satisfactory service are
correctly reflected in her ANG/USAFR Point Credit Summary.
In regard to the applicants request concerning her Navy Reserve
participation points, they recommend she petition the United
States Navy.
The complete DPTS evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 1 April 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has received no
response.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2013-00797 in Executive Session on 14 November 2013,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in connection
with AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-00797:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 Jan 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, ARPC/DPTS, dated 21 Mar 13.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Apr 13.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04160
As stated on the point credit summary, the member was instructed to review the summary and report errors within 30 days of receipt. However, the Board is willing to reconsider the applicants request should she produce the documentation to verify her participation during the missing dates. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 February 2014.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04510
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04510 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Retention/Retirement Year Ending (RYE) in 2002 be credited with additional retirement points to reflect a satisfactory year toward retirement. STATEMENT OF FACTS: During the RYE 11 Jun 02, the applicant was credited with five active duty points, 24 Inactive Duty Training (IDT) points, 15 membership points,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00458
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00458 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her record be corrected to reflect 52 retirement points for the year 6 Sep 11 - 5 Sep 12 and satisfactory service for the Retirement Year Ending (RYE) 17 Aug 12. DPTS states that the initial audit, prior service record capture, and resulting R/R...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04010
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ ARPC/DPTS recommends denial. To verify and ensure all possible participation was captured and recorded on the AF Form 526, ARPC obtained pay records which correspond exactly to the dates and number of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05693
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. He could have used this time to earn the 33 non-paid points he needed to complete a satisfactory years of service for RYE 17 Dec 12. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 18 Feb 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04147
On 4 October 2010, he transferred from the Air Force (AF) Reserve to the Air National Guard (ANG). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In further support of his request, the applicant submits a letter dated 6 March 2014, that states he concurs with the ARPC/DPTS...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00612
DPTS states that due to a delay in processing the 20 August 2012, scroll at the SecDef level the applicant incurred a break in service between his date of separation and his appointment date into the Air Force Reserve. Therefore, they recommend approval of the applicants request to reflect no break in service and corrections to service dates and ARPC IMT 92. The complete ARPC/DPTS evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01768
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. In addition, in Oct 97 she did not qualify for retirement...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01465
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01465 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Total Federal Commissioned Service Date (TFCSD) be adjusted to remove all periods assigned to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) and Standby Reserve. On 21 July 1992 she requested separation, which was approved and completed effective 30 September...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02478
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: At the time of her medical retirement, she requested to stay on active duty long enough to complete her final satisfactory service year for a reserve retirement; however, her request was denied. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial due to the applicant not completing sufficient participation points required by law to qualify for retirement. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...